(for that kind of work, you really need more RAM too, but I digress.) I think applying 4 cores to your VM might bottleneck a bit tho, I don't recall if that i5 supports hyper-threading so it not you're not leaving a lot of cores on the table for macOS to do it's thing. Coming from an Intel Iris GPU tho, you'll most definitely see a big improvement. If it were me, I wouldn't throw away the eGPU box until you've tested your software first and decided that the improvement is worth it. this is not a passthrough thing, it just uses the more powerful GPU to render guest graphics instead of the integrated one that your Mac already has, but macOS doesn't support Nvidia GPUs at all.) Like Technogeezer said tho, only AMD cards will work, not Nvidia, just due to lack of host driver. But anecdotally, folks who do have mentioned to me that it is a noticeable and not subtle improvement. Mind you, I'm not doing things like AutoCad in VMs, so I'm a bit unsure just how the performance improvements translate to real-world usage of those tools. Things are a tad noisier in my office as a result, but it's markedly faster. On par with the Radon Pro Vega in my iMac Pro. Personally I have a Radeon 5700xt connected to my 6-core Mac mini and it just hauls. Performance wise, it's a huge improvement, depending on the GPU you're using and what you're coming from. Speed is one thing, functionality is another (making sure everything works as expected). You may also want to verify how well each of those packages run under Fusion and its available 3D support without the eGPU. It's recommended to use no more than n-1 cores of a host that has n cores (hyper threaded cores don't count) to give the operating system some resources to support Fusion and anything else that might run on it. The Metal API should run faster, but the end result is dependent on VMware's implementation.Ī comment: running a 4 core VM on a 4 core machine may starve the system for resources. That VMware driver interfaces with the virtual graphics adapter provided by Fusion, which in turn (IIRC) is implemented using macOS Metal API calls that get executed by the GPU. The guest will be using a VMware SVGA graphics card driver, not a vendor graphics driver. My reasoning: The VM's operating system will not have direct access to the eGPU features - just as the guest does not have direct access to an on-board GPU's features. My gut feeling is that it will be better than the integrated graphics in your MacBook Pro, but not sure what the overall performance will be. I'm not sure what the performance will be. I believe that external GPUs are now officially supported, given the indications in the Fusion 12.0 release notes. Will the eGPU provide minimal or significant performance improvement? (I know this is relative but I don't want to waste time or money.).Will an eGPU work within VMware Fusion? (I have seen a few posts saying that it was added into Fusion in a preview but nothing concrete since 2 years ago.).One of my classmates heard me talking to an instructor about eGPUs and he offered to sell me a Razer Core X (no video card installed) at a really good price. I have been able to run Revit 2022 successfully but I fear that as my classwork will start delving into more rendering my VM won't be able to handle the demand. I currently run a virtual machine to run the software for my classes (see list below). My reason for using an eGPU is for coursework in CADD. I have started looking into eGPUs and their capabilities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |